GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: Steven Bird <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:59:57 -0600
References: <CA824C4968F14F569388AC524C6D4D00@JohnPC><000501cb95ea$da5a54b0$8f0efe10$@dgmweb.net><AANLkTik7qEa9Ji7SNK7rO_gzoV7gXsUYM9DZF7j2Rbw5@mail.gmail.com>,<AANLkTimB65Towp=oTmyM6Cjo6zS_dyX4yD16HaiB_sUW@mail.gmail.com>,<004b01cb965b$4729e770$c2482dae@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <004b01cb965b$4729e770$c2482dae@Ken1>

I do, Ken. It is an excellent example of ascertainment bias. The results may seem to be more important than they actually are based simply upon the population from which the sample was selected.



Steve


>
> I hope this does not seem nit picking, but I still don't get a sense the
> list contributors yet accept both the largely accidental and bias-driven
> nature of the particular set of snps we have right now in the y tree. KN]]
>

This thread:

• [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by "Alister John Marsh" <>
  • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
    • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by "Alister John Marsh" <>
      • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by Robert Stafford <>
    • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by Vince Tilroe <>
      • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
      • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by Mike W <>
        • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
          • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by Mike W <>
            • [DNA] GAP 2.0 Problem by "Paul Pettit" <>
              • Re: [DNA] GAP 2.0 Problem by Wilcox Lisa <>
                • Re: [DNA] GAP 2.0 Problem by "Lewis Townsend" <>
              • Re: [DNA] GAP 2.0 Problem by Steve Trangsrud <>
              • Re: [DNA] GAP 2.0 Problem by (John Chandler)
                • Re: [DNA] GAP 2.0 Problem by "Paul Pettit" <>

          • Re: [DNA] DNAH 15 marker Y-DNA panel by Steven Bird <>