GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-12 > 1293573595


From: Rebecca <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] significance of GD 7 at 67 markers
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:59:55 -0500
References: <8CD74DD3905D19F-12DC-2022B@webmail-d101.sysops.aol.com><000001cba6cd$70c27610$52476230$@dgmweb.net>
In-Reply-To: <000001cba6cd$70c27610$52476230$@dgmweb.net>


Yes, his surname is Perry. He is kit 108447 at the Perry website
http://www.perry-dna.org/pages/ydnaResultsFrameSet.html


-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Gale Matthiesen <>
To:
Sent: Tue, Dec 28, 2010 8:25 pm
Subject: Re: [DNA] significance of GD 7 at 67 markers


You haven't given us enough information. What is the surname of the
person in
question and what are his results?

If he's a different surname, I wouldn't bother investigating further.
If he's a
PERRY, I would.

Diana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
> ] On Behalf Of Rebecca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 2:33 PM
> To:
> Subject: [DNA] significance of GD 7 at 67 markers
>
> Could I ask the list for an opinion on a project member's
relationship to
genetic cluster
> 09 in the Perry project. His paper trail suggests
> he belongs here.
> http://www.perry-dna.org/pages/ydnaResultsFrameSet.html He matches
> only one other kit 111434 in this cluster, but at a genetic distance
of
> 7 out of 67 markers. The FTDNA chart at
> https://www.familytreedna.com/faq/answers/default.aspx?faqid=9#915
> judges GD7 at 67 as only 'possibly' related and 'unlikely' to be
related in a
genealogical
> time frame. There seems to be no allowance made for which markers are
involved.
> Advice?
> Rebecca
>
>




-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to

with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the
body of
the message



This thread: