GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-12 > 1293586849
From: Allene Goforth <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] significance of GD 7 at 67 markers
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:40:49 -0800
References: <8CD74DD3905D19F-12DC-2022B@webmail-d101.sysops.aol.com>,<000001cba6cd$70c27610$52476230$@dgmweb.net>,<8CD74F1B209D23B-12DC-22461@webmail-d101.sysops.aol.com><COL118-W382FFB4E1F1BD139D7E6F6A0010@phx.gbl> <000f01cba6f3$3ac45440$b04cfcc0$@dgmweb.net><004e01cba6f4$71c3f5d0$c2482dae@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <004e01cba6f4$71c3f5d0$c2482dae@Ken1>
So why doesn't FTDNA count them that way to begin with? I came on here
last summer about the GD 8 at 67 markers between my husband and his
match. Thomas Krahn said something about it being more like a GD 5, but
that's not how it was actually calculated. It would save us a lot of
time if they did the kind of calculations you are talking about before
posting the matches.
Allene
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] significance of GD 7 at 67 markers by Allene Goforth <> |