GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-12 > 1293669926


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] The death of paragroups
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:45:41 -0700
References: <8FB365E1-2876-4664-AA70-3CCD4CEBB9CB@vizachero.com> <000501cba78a$0850ce70$c2482dae@Ken1> <003b01cba79b$5dbd2f00$19378d00$@dgmweb.net><2219B882-5792-486B-850D-5458D6A5DC96@vizachero.com><005101cba7b0$a3189110$e949b330$@dgmweb.net>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>

> Whether you view the SNPs as strewn out on the branches or sitting
> (unresolved)
> at the node is a distinction mainly in your mind.

[[ Indeed, those who remain confused and don't realize the distinction you
carelessly dismiss above, go on to falsely believe they estimate ages of
snps rather than the actual ages of nodes earlier or (more often) later than
the untimed snp events . ]]


This thread: