GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1293904273
From: Sam Eaton <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing (Robert Stafford)
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Your suggestion short changes the ability to to research between one third and one half of all available yDNA tests. I consider 76 markers, the 67 marker FTDNA test plus the 9 SMGF additional markers to be the proper standard. Can anyone here tell me why it is good research procedure to ignore between one third and one half of the available data?
|Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing (Robert Stafford) by Sam Eaton <>|