GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1293933820


From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 20:03:40 -0600
References: <52025593-9EF1-4A5D-A729-4186037ECADE@comcast.net><AANLkTimbhkZKMrkwW97ttsEwaJgRnz8=GawEo7R0Pxyd@mail.gmail.com><013d01cba961$023bb3a0$06b31ae0$@dgmweb.net><AANLkTingPqvZGSs46TOyAobjeTjx-mzzi_Hfh1e4F_zo@mail.gmail.com><003201cba9f3$274065f0$75c131d0$@dgmweb.net><AANLkTim-=MYkeN5Tz33Ga9D5zMSvgWJoHhxAAPQf-WT2@mail.gmail.com><AANLkTikLaa-mtPYKRm+dayY=pSX+04nqoXgtunrnAWmH@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLaa-mtPYKRm+dayY=pSX+04nqoXgtunrnAWmH@mail.gmail.com>


Mike,

You need to specify whether they were same-surname matches and/or whether
there was a paper trail.

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Mike W <> wrote:

> Steven,
>
> As a project administrator, I've seen a number of times where R-P312
> and R-L21* people have new matches at 67 markers (on FTDNA Y matches
> screens) that weren't there at 25 or 37 markers. At the same time I
> see 37 marker matches drop off at 67.
>
>

This thread: