GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1294067158
From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:05:58 -0600
References: <5F3B12A4D09E4D70AF3C541871E0610D@NEWGAMES><001e01cbaabb$56d99f20$048cdd60$@dgmweb.net><DD790F8C0FD347BEBAF1382ABD84740F@JohnPC>
In-Reply-To: <DD790F8C0FD347BEBAF1382ABD84740F@JohnPC>
I would consider YFiler in those cases, if the project is using the
genealogical (BYU) methodology.
https://dna.familybuilder.com/
17 markers will provide enough discrimination to match "orphan" lines with
baseline haplotypes once the family groups have been distinguished with
higher-resolution tests, so few people would need more markers.
Bob Stafford
>>On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Alister John Marsh <>wrote:
I have always been in support of people testing only 12 markers if that is
all they can afford initially.<<
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing by Robert Stafford <> |