GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1294082693


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:24:53 -0500
References: <5F3B12A4D09E4D70AF3C541871E0610D@NEWGAMES><001e01cbaabb$56d99f20$048cdd60$@dgmweb.net><DD790F8C0FD347BEBAF1382ABD84740F@JohnPC><AANLkTikbhyxiO6dMmsRqDJa06Ndu5=iS9PwWkxg6+C6k@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikbhyxiO6dMmsRqDJa06Ndu5=iS9PwWkxg6+C6k@mail.gmail.com>


Bob,

I'm sure that some will appreciate your ABF ("anything but FTDNA")
approach to DNA testing.

But given the number of different places you'd have to go to replicate
what FTDNA does (I've counted four different firms recommended by you
in this thread, none of which does everything FTDNA does even in
combination), I'm not surprised that FTDNA remains the market leader.

VV


On Jan 3, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Robert Stafford wrote:

> I would consider YFiler in those cases, if the project is using the
> genealogical (BYU) methodology.

This thread: