GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1294141189


From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 05:39:49 -0600
References: <5F3B12A4D09E4D70AF3C541871E0610D@NEWGAMES><001e01cbaabb$56d99f20$048cdd60$@dgmweb.net><DD790F8C0FD347BEBAF1382ABD84740F@JohnPC><AANLkTikbhyxiO6dMmsRqDJa06Ndu5=iS9PwWkxg6+C6k@mail.gmail.com><96275237-1E93-4727-9884-3A39F35DFE88@vizachero.com><AANLkTikLydTUhjLtwdo=+mh0N-7kaSosMQy2BPe3N3T2@mail.gmail.com><BA5BD49888314B158D17B42DF716178F@NEWGAMES>
In-Reply-To: <BA5BD49888314B158D17B42DF716178F@NEWGAMES>


What do you mean by properly tested. Surely, you are not suggesting that ARL
is more accurate than other labs. I do not know why they retested at FTDNA,
but am pretty certain it had more to do with the personality of the project
coordinator than any rational need.

Bob Stafford

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Debbie Kennett <>wrote:

> Bob
>
> These cheap companies are a false economy. Anyone testing with a company
> like Family Builder is only going to have to pay again to be retested at
> Family Tree DNA.
>

This thread: