GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1294178637


From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recommendations for DNA testing
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:03:57 -0600
References: <5F3B12A4D09E4D70AF3C541871E0610D@NEWGAMES><001e01cbaabb$56d99f20$048cdd60$@dgmweb.net><DD790F8C0FD347BEBAF1382ABD84740F@JohnPC><AANLkTikbhyxiO6dMmsRqDJa06Ndu5=iS9PwWkxg6+C6k@mail.gmail.com><96275237-1E93-4727-9884-3A39F35DFE88@vizachero.com><AANLkTikLydTUhjLtwdo=+mh0N-7kaSosMQy2BPe3N3T2@mail.gmail.com><BA5BD49888314B158D17B42DF716178F@NEWGAMES><AANLkTinfHkoQS=5RfCOXed_fk8PypKQ1eAs22gYH8Uwp@mail.gmail.com><7638B067C67844DABB0485BCEB7C84C7@NEWGAMES>
In-Reply-To: <7638B067C67844DABB0485BCEB7C84C7@NEWGAMES>


Several cases were reported on the list some time ago. If interested you
might search the archives, although I do not think it is particularly
relevant now. It was reported that there were a number of procedural changes
at the lab in question and I have not seen any current reports.

Bob Stafford


On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Debbie Kennett <>wrote:

> I've not heard of any cases of people testing at different companies and
> being given different values for their markers (other than the companies
> reporting the markers in different ways) though I suppose in theory this
> could happen. It's certainly helpful that some people have tested at
> different labs so that results can be compared for accuracy.
>
>

This thread: