GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-01 > 1294517229


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] How many realistic locations on the Y for SNPs?9
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:07:09 -0500
References: <CCC150916E8E4411AFE12370BBEEE726@PC><001f01cbaeb0$4c9bff00$c2482dae@Ken1><63975AE0-4907-4B8A-93D3-90B240793C8A@verizon.net><002201cbaef0$22bda8b0$c2482dae@Ken1><B62B7165-4267-4A0D-B8C4-7934D3BA2908@verizon.net><008901cbaf4b$951943a0$c2482dae@Ken1><334594.608.qm@web403.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><A376AF95-1673-41ED-A346-0BCCE03304D6@verizon.net>
In-Reply-To: <A376AF95-1673-41ED-A346-0BCCE03304D6@verizon.net>


Also, that's just the number of SNPs tested by 23andMe known to vary
within the sample of men who have reported their results publicly.
There are other known phylogenetically useful SNPs not tested by
23andMe, and I'd estimate that number to to also be in the hundreds.

VV


On Jan 8, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Jim Bartlett wrote:

> If we have only 700 phylogenetically useful SNPs, I'm really confused

This thread: