GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-03 > 1299342833


From: Ann Turner <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] American Indian Project opposition to Genographic Projectat Cornell
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 08:33:53 -0800
References: <AANLkTi=df7StrXAC4CUm5NFLpTgQ3B2SB+f=B98RGXk3@mail.gmail.com><699521.22566.qm@web31507.mail.mud.yahoo.com><AANLkTikr8gG_FYz1F9bys23wTO7uRVUm1fdObOait+2h@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikr8gG_FYz1F9bys23wTO7uRVUm1fdObOait+2h@mail.gmail.com>


I see Dienekes referred to the Cornell controversy in his recent post about
inferring Native American autosomal DNA in Latinos.

http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2011/03/genetic-variation-in-native-americans.html

Ugo Perego of Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation has also published
some papers about less common mtDNA subclades:

http://www.genetree.com/documents/achilli_perego_distinctive_perego_et_al_paleo_indian_migrations_2009_current_biology.pdf

http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2010/06/24/gr.109231.110.full.pdf+html

Ann Turner




On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Ann Turner <> wrote:

> The thread seems to have drifted a bit. The original post was about an
> educational exercise with 200 students selected at random for a Genographic
> Project "public participation" test,
>

This thread: