GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-03 > 1300416085


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] NPE rate
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:41:25 -0400
References: <mailman.381.1300345245.9142.genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> <554.46446.qm@web39605.mail.mud.yahoo.com><AANLkTi=ac_sozZjOPQnHK0Mk6PmuhoNjXiHUfhhEhKUF@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ac_sozZjOPQnHK0Mk6PmuhoNjXiHUfhhEhKUF@mail.gmail.com>


It's just a project rate, not corrected for number of generations. It
does not include simple cases of bad paper genealogy. These are
people with a good paper genealogy that is refuted by the test
results.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
> ] On Behalf Of Ann Turner
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:54 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] NPE rate
>
> Or a "project" rate, which is not corrected for the number of
> generations
> involved in detecting the NPE?
<snip>

This thread: