GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-03 > 1300416863
From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] NPE rate
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:54:23 -0400
It matters, to me. I don't consider the discovery of a mistake in
paper genealogy to be an NPE, it's just bad paper genealogy. IMO,
it's an NPE when the paper genealogy is good, but refuted by the DNA.
> From: Wilcox Lisa
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 5:25 PM
> > On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:34 AM, A. J. Levin wrote:
> > Is this an "NPE rate" or an aggregate NPE/bad-genealogy rate?
> Doesn't matter. In the context of a surname project, it just means
> "people whose matches (or lack thereof) are unexpected."
|Re: [DNA] NPE rate by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>|