GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-05 > 1304946131


From: Ann Turner <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Re : Re : new earliest I tree structure
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 06:02:11 -0700
References: <348260.72585.qm@web26202.mail.ukl.yahoo.com><119371930.2008441304932379075.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>
In-Reply-To: <119371930.2008441304932379075.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>


That's a higher proportion of no-calls for rs7892855 than I like to see. The
entry at dbSNP shows it maps to three different positions on the Y. That
might make it problematic.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=7892855

Ann Turner

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:12 AM, <> wrote:

> You can check it on Adriano Squecco excel file.
> A is ancestral and C is derived.
> On this file there are 3 I2 negative to L460, 19 positive, and 48 with
> no-calls.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Itaï Perez.
>



This thread: