GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] time=$
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:44:07 -0400
References: <E7B4F2E388AD433EBCE347CDA8F73FFA@kenPC> <009001cc8370$19f8e6e0$4deab4a0$@dgmweb.net><CAA-Ub_CK9PqXjNw=60Q3zn7kFp1Si97+YGwnZCZ_CZrzzWiL3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA-Ub_CK9PqXjNw=60Q3zn7kFp1Si97+YGwnZCZ_CZrzzWiL3w@mail.gmail.com>

I was under the impression that part of the delay in routine DNA
testing is that it takes time to "amplify" the DNA. If so, there
would be no way paying more would shorten that time -- and nothing the
labs could do to shorten the time.

Diana

This thread:

• [DNA] time=$ by "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>
  • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
    • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>
    • Re: [DNA] time=$ by Ann Turner <>
      • Re: [DNA] time=$ by Paul Wright <>

      • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>

        • Re: [DNA] time=$ by Raymond Wing <>
      • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "RICHARD KENYON" <>
  • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Alister John Marsh" <>
    • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>
      • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Alister John Marsh" <>
        • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>
          • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Alister John Marsh" <>
            • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Alister John Marsh" <>
              • Re: [DNA] time=$ by "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>