GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-10 > 1318897910


From: Andrew Mceachern <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Challenge73
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAOpmmim+_ztJcx3AXYj4GA5JbSL1d-p96Fa6Cy+KK96HHUtfyA@mail.gmail.com><CAKBVi9k2_2BwvnfXE-=dvoaKieJQ_inmaKKoF7M6wQrcfQ+3qw@mail.gmail.com><18F059F618594DAD99CEC81153131AEC@kenPC><F12AADD7832242BC897100ED1B1B142D@kenPC><CAKBVi9mB3umWDUJnjqEbiVEiNDXwbmcyVTqTEnmC7cmhO=M5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKBVi9mB3umWDUJnjqEbiVEiNDXwbmcyVTqTEnmC7cmhO=M5Wg@mail.gmail.com>


Has anyone used Phylip for this challenge yet?

Thanks

Andrew



________________________________
From: John S Walden <>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2011 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Challenge73

Ken wrote :    But on converting to the original haplotype numbers, some
pairing is
showing,

If these should be paired  1,2  and 3,4  as the previous challenge
then the only pairing that came out solid is 31,32
All the other 15  would be accidental in the way the network just happened
to be printed
I posted the Median Joining no weighting names converted back to original
here

http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~jswdna/Challenge8957/challenge73%20weight10o.pdf

Thus the FLUXUS program failed this test?

John W

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: