GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-10 > 1320098759


From: "Jacques P. Beaugrand" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Surname Projects - September 30, 2011 - Part 1 of 3
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:05:59 -0400
References: <2d79.b7fbe6c.3bdf1a04@aol.com>,<REME20111031133301@alum.mit.edu> <COL118-W32530426FB52808AC941C7A0D60@phx.gbl> <012b01cc9808$fe97e6f0$fbc7b4d0$@jacques@uqam.ca><00c601cc9811$9f25c3a0$dd714ae0$@dgmweb.net>
In-Reply-To: <00c601cc9811$9f25c3a0$dd714ae0$@dgmweb.net>


And how do you decide a priori which DNA will be displayed and which will
not ?
Jacques



-----Message d'origine-----
De :
[mailto:] De la part de Diana Gale
Matthiesen
Envoyé : 31 octobre 2011 17:11
À :
Objet : Re: [DNA] Surname Projects - September 30, 2011 - Part 1 of 3

I run a dual project, and it is *not* the case that if someone joins
both their Y-DNA and mtDNA results are necessarily displayed. As
project admin, I can control which is displayed. As for autosomal DNA
(FF), it has nothing to do with the projects.

Diana


> From: Jacques P. Beaugrand
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:09 PM
>
> The problem with ungrouped *members* is largely structural; it is
> due to the
> structure of dual projects at FTDNA. In dual projects (as the French
> Heritage) one cannot register under his/her mtDNA leaving his/her
> (patrilineal) yDNA for another project.
> It is the person as a whole that registers, with all his/her types
> of DNA,
> YDNA, mtDNA, autosomal.
<snip>



-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message



This thread: