GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-11 > 1322172723


From: Wilcox Lisa <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Problems with some surname project admins
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:12:03 -0800
References: <8CE69FEF2FB7792-714-16C223@webmail-d134.sysops.aol.com> <CAMoZBXdUkvoYkfHXFreyiap8krcLGHdRi2SLYfyp4mbY8AGAXQ@mail.gmail.com> <4ECE6DB5.4040706@jarman.net><REME20111124140817@alum.mit.edu> <4ECEA943.30104@jarman.net>
In-Reply-To: <4ECEA943.30104@jarman.net>


Change your subject line, guys.

On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:29 PM, John German wrote:

>
>
> John Chandler wrote:
>
>> Second, and more on the
>> theoretical side, we should all be acutely aware of the incidental
>> non-paternity statistics coming out of various studies of newborns.
>> Such statistics are at odds with the fact that so many surname
>> projects have successfully lined up conventional-genealogical
>> descendants of known progenitors and found their DNA to match. I have
>> long felt that there must be a correlation between interest in
>> genealogy and ancestral lineage intactness. In other words, the
>> early testees were more likely than average to carry the DNA of their
>> overt ancestors, regardless of whether their ancestry had been
>> correctly researched already. This phenomenon may also have
>> something to do with the continuing trickle of new and unmatching
>> results in the surname projects, as the projects build momentum and
>> start sweeping up less-and-less-avid testees.
>>
>>
>
> You didn't suggest whether the NPEs were old or recent. In case of the
> latter I fear you have left out the testees ages. Baby boomers ushered
> in an age of promiscuity that is showing no reversal in out-of-wedlock
> births. I'll guess that more "Generation Xers" are interested in
> genealogy now than ten years ago when we were pioneering DNA testing for
> genealogy.
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message



This thread: