GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2011-12 > 1323198386


From: Mike W <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] King Tut's DNA
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:06:26 -0600
References: <mailman.591.1323180364.5870.genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com><2099618496.721580.1323193513179.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <2099618496.721580.1323193513179.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>


Anatole,

I think you are saying the P312 and U106 L11 lineages came along the North
Africa route. Is that correct, or do you think P312 and U106 occurred in
Asia or nearby, before they started spreading along the various routes?

In other words is all P312 and all U106 derived of the North Africa then
Iberia route?

Mike W

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Anatole Klyosov

... It seems that there were at least three principal routes: (1) across
North Africa and then Gibraltar into the Pyrenees, and then as the Bell
Beakers to the continental Europe (the oldest archaeological evidences for
BB are found in Portugal and dated 4,900-4,800 ybp; the interclade TMRCA
for R-P312 and R-U106 gives the same date, namely 4,800 ybp; there is
plenty of R-M269* and P312* in the Pyrenees), (2) directly from Asia Minor
westward (mainly R-L23), and (3) from Pontic steppes (north of the Black
Sea) westward, again mainly L23.

This thread: