GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2012-02 > 1328523565
From: "Anatole Klyosov" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Question regarding Markers DYS459 and DYS464
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 05:19:25 -0500
> I would appreciate if you give a reference for such a study, in which it
> [DYS464] was "a very useful part in this latter task", besides, of course,
> those listed in my preceding message.
> From: "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>
> In just Hg I the examples are very, very numerous. I'll just indicate a
> few. (...)
Thank you. However, you did not give A REFERENCE (in a scientific journal).
I meant a publication, not just considerations, though resonable. Those
qualitative considerations are plentiful, of course, including this very
thread, and I am obviously aware of them. Therefore, what I meant, were
QUANTITATIVE considerations, that is calculations using DYS464 mutational
pattern. I would not have asked about obvious things. I thought it was clear
from my "besides, of course, those listed in my preceding nessage".
|Re: [DNA] Question regarding Markers DYS459 and DYS464 by "Anatole Klyosov" <>|