GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2012-02 > 1329784902


From: "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] I1 query--Deep Clade?
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:41:42 -0700
References: <BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPKEHNINAA.dna@irishtype3dna.org> <1F794FB05B924D5ABA04C8FB8059D153@kenPC> <8CEBDDA5A861E5C-844-ABDD@webmail-d178.sysops.aol.com> <00b201ccf00c$aeb5de10$0c219a30$@dgmweb.net><4F42AF47.5080105@sbcglobal.net> <00c701ccf01d$b19c4c70$14d4e550$@dgmweb.net><166EBF1364B043FF9B2B0BDCE054B2CB@kenPC><00f001ccf02f$27177680$75466380$@dgmweb.net>
In-Reply-To: <00f001ccf02f$27177680$75466380$@dgmweb.net>


-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Gale Matthiesen

Please let's not waste time going back and
forth saying, "yes, it does," "no, it doesn't." We disagree.

I don't share your apparent disdain and paternalistic attitude towards
the hobbyist. I think they are intelligent adults, fully capable of
understanding the issues and making their own decisions. They are not
in need of "protection" from some imagined evil empire in the form of
FTDNA.

[[To immediately follow another of your "let's agree to disagree kind of
comment" with your then misrepresenting last paragraph; I'll say 'shove it'.
Why don't you stick to representing your position; rather than rewriting
that of others?

It is precisely because I prefer to interact with hobbyists who wish to take
informed testing steps instead of pre-packaged fluff offered by the company
that our approaches to the hobby differ. KN ]]

This thread: