GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2012-04 > 1334588566
From: "Lawrence Mayka" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Out of Africa
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:02:46 -0500
References: <DF221991C4274B70BD1BE75580875C63@anatoldesktop> <9C4FBBAD2F1C4A9686FC822C9C765F3D@anatoldesktop><9B6CE31C0C9342FD9D05B1557A23537D@anatoldesktop>
In-Reply-To: <9B6CE31C0C9342FD9D05B1557A23537D@anatoldesktop>
The emergence of AMH from Africa has been the predominant theory among
archaeologists and paleontologists for several decades, although the precise
route and timing of that expansion continues to be a topic of healthy
debate.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6013/20.summary
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/01/110127-out-of-africa-earlier
-early-humans-left-science-climate-stone-tools/
The theory was not, and is not, based primarily on genetics, although DNA
results of several kinds tend to support the theory.
> From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
> ] On Behalf Of Anatole Klyosov
> 5. The anatomically modern human came out of Africa around 70,000 years
ago.
> This is
> "genetic genealogy" in its nakedness.
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Out of Africa by "Lawrence Mayka" <> |