GENMSC-L Archives

Archiver > GENMSC > 2007-07 > 1184720901


From: Wes Groleau <groleau+>
Subject: Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:08:21 GMT
References: <slrnf9ol6e.cvf.usenet@goodwill.larseighner.com><1184689853.767732.28500@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com><2h6ni.9164$zA4.5373@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net><slrnf9pttu.fnh.usenet@goodwill.larseighner.com><2t7ni.8570$Od7.2064@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <2t7ni.8570$Od7.2064@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>


Robert Melson wrote:
> After all the early drum-pounding and huzzahs, it seems the
> proposed gedcom 6 standard, based on xml, has died aborning.

I will admit to not having read every single word of that
standard, but my impression was that it solved nothing.
From as much as I did read, it seemed to me that there was
as much _practical_ difference between 5.5 and 6.0 as there
is between English and "pig latin"

--
Wes Groleau

Expert, n.:
Someone who comes from out of town and shows slides.

This thread: