GENMSC-L Archives

Archiver > GENMSC > 2007-07 > 1184803474


From: Wes Groleau <groleau+>
Subject: Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:04:34 GMT
References: <slrnf9ol6e.cvf.usenet@goodwill.larseighner.com><1184689853.767732.28500@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com><2h6ni.9164$zA4.5373@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net><1Hdni.12913$LH5.8035@trnddc02>
In-Reply-To: <1Hdni.12913$LH5.8035@trnddc02>


Wes Groleau wrote:
> I take it back--the worst I've seen came from a program
> that desperately took on the futile challenge not only

To be fair, that program had other features so useful that
I wouldn't use anything else for quite a while. Eventually,
I no longer needed those features as much, so I switched to
LifeLines for a better implementation of GEDCOM (i.e., less
limited). Finally, even LifeLines restrictions on GEDCOM
became an irritation to me and I settled for editing GEDCOM
directly. Which of course is very error-prone, but ....

--
Wes Groleau
-----------
I've been framed! ...
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9612.html

This thread: