GOONS-L Archives

Archiver > GOONS > 2005-12 > 1133658958


From: "Barbara Griffiths" <>
Subject: Re: [G] Another Guild collaborative project - the Wiki
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:15:58 -0000
References: <014101c5f850$cd9f79e0$6401a8c0@DELL>


> Of course, 'ouch' was not intended. I have no problem with a structured
> approach to describing data, as Jean-Baptist suggests, merely that the Guild
> policy on data collection for registered studies should be included
> somewhere in the topic.

Perhaps I am missing the point here but since the wording of the Guild policy on
registration is already established, why can't that (and the sub page "What you
should aim to collect") appear as an item before the "In essence, there are
seven aspects of a One-Name Study: " on the Carrying out a One Name Study page.

If that appeared as a separate (locked?) section entitled (something like) "The
Guild's recommendations" or "The Guild Requirements", it would then leave the
Data Collection and other aspects free to be structured in whichever style
develops as members discuss the suggestions made by Jean-Baptiste Piggin and
Andrew Millard.

Otherwise development of the knowledge store is surely likely to be restricted
by that existing wording?

Regards
Barbara Griffiths
Coventry UK


This thread: