GRANNYS-NA-PANTRY-L Archives
Archiver > GRANNYS-NA-PANTRY > 2000-09 > 0967824140
From:
Subject: [GRANNYS-NA-PANTRY] Native American remains lost in nation's museums
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:02:20 EDT
Native American remains lost in nation's museums
By MICHELLE LOCKE,
The Associated Press
BERKELEY, Calif. (August 27, 2000 6:48 p.m. EDT http://www.nandotimes.com )
-
The return of Ishi's remains to his Indian homeland 80 years after
scientists
removed his brain in the interests of science has drawn new attention to the
quest to retrieve ancestral bones from museum basements.
Ishi, it turns out, is an exception. Ten years after Congress ordered Native
American remains returned to their tribes, only 10 percent of about 200,000
remains estimated to be in public collections are even officially
inventoried, federal records show.
With more than 8,000 Indian remains, the collection of the University of
California, Berkeley, is third only to those at the Smithsonian and Harvard.
So far, however, the school has returned only an amulet and an earthenware
jar.
While a variety of factors lie behind the delays, two stand out:
Institutions have been slow to reveal their holdings to Indians as they try
to match bones to tribes, and federal officials have been slow to do
anything about the data that have been turned in.
Underlying the logistical logjam is a clash of science and sacrament - a
struggle to balance the study of the rites of man with the rights of men.
"It really comes down to a distinction between thinking that you own remains
or sacred objects versus understanding that you are custodians or stewards
for them," said Martin Sullivan, a historian who recently completed eight
years on the national advisory committee overseeing the repatriation law.
Scientists who see repatriation in terms of lost research opportunities are
wrong, said G. Peter Jemison, repatriation coordinator for the Seneca Nation
of Indians in New York State.
"They're going to come in contact with the living people and they're going
to learn so much more than they're ever going to learn by using a ruler,"
Jemison said.
Ishi walked out of the wilderness of Northern California in 1911, the last
survivor of his tribe. He was taken in by researchers and lived out his days
at a museum where he demonstrated his skills for curious crowds.
When Ishi died in 1916, his brain was removed - against his request not to
be autopsied - and his body cremated. His brain was sent to the Smithsonian,
where it remained largely forgotten until a group of California Indians
began searching for him in 1997.
Although Ishi was known as the "last of the Yahi," the Smithsonian ruled
that Ishi had ties to a surviving tribe, which decided to reunite his brain
with his cremated remains for burial in a secret ceremony near Mount Lassen.
"Hopefully, he will be at last at rest and at peace and free to join his
family and ancestors," Mickey Gemmill, a member of the Pit River tribe, told
the Mercury News before he and other tribe members went to Washington
earlier this month to take custody of the brain.
The 1990 federal law requires all federally funded agencies and museums to
return remains. Inventories were to be completed in 1995. After an extension
and a threat of fines, Berkeley finally finished its inventory of remains on
June 30.
About 17 percent of Berkeley's remains have been determined to be affiliated
with a particular tribe, meaning they can be claimed. Three requests are
pending.
Compliance with the law is overseen by the National Park Service, but there
is a two-year backlog on publishing the legal notices required before some
items can be returned, said John Robbins, NPS assistant director for
cultural resources.
The parks service doesn't keep track of remains returned, only of remains
inventoried.
Despite the headaches, Sullivan believes overall that the law is working.
"What's happened is there's finally a national standard that recognizes
these human rights," Sullivan said.
Copyright © 2000 Nando Media
[In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only.]
This thread: