HOISINGTON-L Archives

Archiver > HOISINGTON > 1999-04 > 0923352783


From: Harriette Jensen< >
Subject: Re: [HOISINGTON-L] Sharing the work...
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:53:03 -0700 (PDT)


Hi, All.

Forwarding a message from Ron.

BTW, if any of you have ISPs that add "pop" or "mail", or any such thing to
your e-mail address when you send messages, let me know and I will add that
version of your address to the "accept" list. These additions cause
Rootsweb to reject your messages. If your sending address is on the accept
list, Rootsweb will forward the messages to the list, but will not send
list messages to them.

Harriette

>Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
>X-From_: Mon Apr 5 15:21:49 1999
>X-Sender:
>Old-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 18:19:55 -0400
>To:
>From: Ron & Kathy <>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
>Subject: {not a subscriber} Re: [HOISINGTON-L] Sharing the work...
>Status: U
>
>Bonnie, I would be more than happy to help proof read as much as possible.
> I wish that I could type. And down the road, I can make as many copies as
>needed in a short amount of time. Not to mention, anything else that I can
>help with.
>
>Ron Davidson
>Conyers, GA.
>
>
>
>
>At 07:51 AM 4/5/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>At 05:04 PM 4/4/99 -0400, William Hoisington wrote:
>>>The typists will have to agree on software format
>>>(Microsoft Word or whatever) and formatting
>>>(capitalizing names, using abt. or c. formats
>>>for dates, in addition to margins and page setups.
>>>before they begin...will save a lot of headaches later on.
>>
>>Yes, good point.
>>
>>>> >I would like to see this happen, then we could proof
>>>> >each other for typing errors.
>>>
>>>If we have volunteers who are not typing, maybe they
>>>could proof?
>>
>>Very good idea!
>>
>>>Again we need to agree on content and format of
>>>correcting errors, but I think we show good source
>>>references, we'll be OK.
>>>
>>>I'm not trying to make any more work for anyone but
>>>I think it's great to have these discussions before
>>>we start. Please comment, and make suggestions....
>>>I'm not locked into academically formalizing this
>>>project, but I find continual interest on other
>>>list-serves of using sources and references. And,
>>>I think with all the work that everyone has done,
>>>it's almost criminal not to provide an updated
>>>version to Harry's work. I think Harry would agree!
>>
>>I agree with everything you suggest. I'm out of
>>my depth with footnotes, (it's been a looong time,
>>but I can be taught!:) I'm going to put you on the
>>typing list, so you can guide us through this.
>>
>>Bonnie -
>>
>><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*>
>> E-Mail - Bonnie S. Dannenberg <>
>> Visit my Home Page - http://www.capital.net/~bonnie/
>> USGenWeb Project; Walden, Vt. http://www.genweb.net/~bonnie
>><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

============================================================
Hoisington Family Web Site <http://www.genweb.net/~hoisington/index.htm>;
Sumner Co. KS <http://www.rootsweb.com/~kssumner/kssumner.htm>;
Kay Co. OK <http://www.rootsweb.com/~okkay/okkay.htm>;
Logan Co. OK <http://www.rootsweb.com/~oklogan/oklogan.htm&g

This thread: