HOISINGTON-L Archives

Archiver > HOISINGTON > 1999-04 > 0923354815


From: Terry Grant <>
Subject: Re: [HOISINGTON-L] Sharing the work...
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 19:26:55 -0400


ok all sorry I can't take it any long PLEASE clue me in on what BTW
stands for.

Harriette Jensen wrote:
>
> Hi, All.
>
> Forwarding a message from Ron.
>
> BTW, if any of you have ISPs that add "pop" or "mail", or any such thing to
> your e-mail address when you send messages, let me know and I will add that
> version of your address to the "accept" list. These additions cause
> Rootsweb to reject your messages. If your sending address is on the accept
> list, Rootsweb will forward the messages to the list, but will not send
> list messages to them.
>
> Harriette
>
> >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
> >X-From_: Mon Apr 5 15:21:49 1999
> >X-Sender:
> >Old-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 18:19:55 -0400
> >To:
> >From: Ron & Kathy <>
> >Mime-Version: 1.0
> >X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
> >Subject: {not a subscriber} Re: [HOISINGTON-L] Sharing the work...
> >Status: U
> >
> >Bonnie, I would be more than happy to help proof read as much as possible.
> > I wish that I could type. And down the road, I can make as many copies as
> >needed in a short amount of time. Not to mention, anything else that I can
> >help with.
> >
> >Ron Davidson
> >Conyers, GA.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >At 07:51 AM 4/5/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >>At 05:04 PM 4/4/99 -0400, William Hoisington wrote:
> >>>The typists will have to agree on software format
> >>>(Microsoft Word or whatever) and formatting
> >>>(capitalizing names, using abt. or c. formats
> >>>for dates, in addition to margins and page setups.
> >>>before they begin...will save a lot of headaches later on.
> >>
> >>Yes, good point.
> >>
> >>>> >I would like to see this happen, then we could proof
> >>>> >each other for typing errors.
> >>>
> >>>If we have volunteers who are not typing, maybe they
> >>>could proof?
> >>
> >>Very good idea!
> >>
> >>>Again we need to agree on content and format of
> >>>correcting errors, but I think we show good source
> >>>references, we'll be OK.
> >>>
> >>>I'm not trying to make any more work for anyone but
> >>>I think it's great to have these discussions before
> >>>we start. Please comment, and make suggestions....
> >>>I'm not locked into academically formalizing this
> >>>project, but I find continual interest on other
> >>>list-serves of using sources and references. And,
> >>>I think with all the work that everyone has done,
> >>>it's almost criminal not to provide an updated
> >>>version to Harry's work. I think Harry would agree!
> >>
> >>I agree with everything you suggest. I'm out of
> >>my depth with footnotes, (it's been a looong time,
> >>but I can be taught!:) I'm going to put you on the
> >>typing list, so you can guide us through this.
> >>
> >>Bonnie -
> >>
> >><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*>
> >> E-Mail - Bonnie S. Dannenberg <>
> >> Visit my Home Page - http://www.capital.net/~bonnie/
> >> USGenWeb Project; Walden, Vt. http://www.genweb.net/~bonnie
> >><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ============================================================
> Hoisington Family Web Site <http://www.genweb.net/~hoisington/index.htm>;
> Sumner Co. KS <http://www.rootsweb.com/~kssumner/kssumner.htm>;
> Kay Co. OK <http://www.rootsweb.com/~okkay/okkay.htm>;
> Logan Co. OK <http://www.rootsweb.com/~oklogan/oklogan.htm&g

This thread: