ILGRUNDY-L Archives

Archiver > ILGRUNDY > 2000-08 > 0965784345


From: <>
Subject: [ILGRUNDY] Fwd: Fw: Fw: Fw: BILL 602P
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 21:25:45 EDT


--part1_bb.5f03531.26c20d19_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



--part1_bb.5f03531.26c20d19_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <>
Received: from rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (rly-ye02.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.199]) by air-ye02.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.11) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2000 20:46:02 -0400
Received: from mta01.onebox.com (mta01.onebox.com [216.33.158.208]) by rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.9) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2000 20:45:42 -0400
Received: from onebox.com ([216.33.158.153]) by mta01.onebox.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP
id <>;
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:45:41 -0700
Received: from [209.138.4.40] by onebox.com with HTTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2000 17:45:56 -0700
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 20:45:56 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fw: Fw: BILL 602P
From: "Nancy Long" <>
To: , , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1BoxPartBoundary96578195615040965781956"
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Unknown


--1BoxPartBoundary96578195615040965781956
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline



________________________________________________________________________
Get your own free email, set up a MyFamily site at http://www.MyFamily.com

--1BoxPartBoundary96578195615040965781956
Content-type: message/rfc822; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Description: email message

Return-Path: <>
Received: from m5.jersey.juno.com ([209.67.33.62]) by mta08.onebox.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id <>
for <>; Tue, 8 Aug 2000 00:19:03 -0700
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for <"hnX8HrTLxLD0Dx8IVvp5bs35hA76CVU1lIAO20tpMZUcB5gwYVa9Bw==">
Received: (from )
by m5.jersey.juno.com (queuemail) id FEXCKZTS; Tue, 08 Aug 2000 03:18:38 EDT
To: , , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 00:15:42 +0000
Subject: Fw: Fw: Fw: BILL 602P
Message-ID: <>
X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-53,55-57,59-62,64-74,76-101,103-110,112-114,116-121,123-136,138-144
X-Juno-Att: 0
X-Juno-RefParts: 0
From: Willette C Bovyer <>



--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marylouise L Tande <>
To: , , ,
,
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 18:05:57 -0700
Subject: Fw: Fw: BILL 602P
Message-ID: <>



--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Judy Gustafson" <>
To: "darin a strange" <>,
"andrew patton" <>,
"andrea madden" <>,
"Ann Greitzer" <>,
"ben hester" <>,
"JILL RUIZ" <>, "bob slama" <>,
"marty dematteo" <>,
"Fred & Linder Nachbaur" <>,
"tommy neuman" <>,
"Bill Greer" <>,
"jon gustafson" <>,
"STEVE & HEATHER SORENSON" <>,
"larue mcarthy" <>,
"Scottie Engblade" <>,
"JAMES & AMY LOOPER" <>,
"Jeanine & Allan" <>,
"Nicole Story" <>,
"Scott Olson" <>,
"JACK & SHEILA GALLIANO" <>,
"Ed Kushins" <>,
"Paul Claussen" <>,
"Paul & Betsy Leber" <>,
"pam connell" <>,
"Greg Ausmus" <>,
"Jana Goldblatt?" <>,
"lindsey a wathen" <>,
"RON K LEU" <>,
"Scott Thomas" <>,
"Martin & Shirley Sloan" <>,
"Ryan & Neal Wathen" <>,
"Heidi Ellis" <>,
"Terry Kennedy" <>,
"lloyd tande" <>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:29:57 -0700
Subject: Fw: BILL 602P
Message-ID: <007401c00030$9aec9500$>


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff & Marge <>
To: Judy <>; James Begg <james > <James
Begg
<james >>; Anna <>; Barb Heiburg
<>; Casey <>; Charlene
<>; Cindy <>; Deanne
<>;
Diane <>; Fern <>; Joyce & Cliff Walsh
<>; Kellie <>; Kollen Barth
<>; Rhonda & Gary <>; Pam Fuller
<>; Pam Lassiter
<>;
The Wagner's <>; Trish & Julio <>;
Valorie <>
Date: Sunday, August 06, 2000 9:58 PM
Subject: Fw: BILL 602P


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <>
>To: <>;
><>; <>;

><>
>Cc: <>;
><>; <>;
><>; <>;

><>; <>;
> <>
>Date: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:52 AM
>Subject: BILL 602P
>
>
>>
>>VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!
>>I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail
>>Sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill
>>602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on
>>every delivered E-mail.
>>Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online, and
>>continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming
>>trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push
>>through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet.
>>Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
>>bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees". Bill 602P will
>>permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every
>>E-Mail
>>delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The
consumer
>>would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
>>Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent
>>this legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming
>>lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
>>$230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad
>>campaign: "There is nothing like a letter."
>>Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in
>>1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50
cents
>>a day - or over $180 per year - above and beyond their regular Internet
>>costs.
>>Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service
for
>>a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is
>>democracy and noninterference. You are already paying an exorbitant
>>price for snail mail because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently
>>takes up
>>to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US
>>Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end
of
>>the free" Internet in the United States. Our congressional
>>representative,
>>Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on
>>all
>>Internet service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail
>>charges
>>Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story -the only
>>exception being the Washingtonian - which called the idea of E-mail
>>surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" March 6th, 1999
>>Editorial).
>>Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this to E-mail to
>>EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and relatives write
>>their congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P. It will
>>only take a few moments of your time and could very well be
instrumental
>>in killing a bill we do not want.
>>Please forward!
>>
>
>



--1BoxPartBoundary96578195615040965781956--

--part1_bb.5f03531.26c20d19_boundary--

This thread: