IOWA-L ArchivesArchiver > IOWA > 2001-02 > 0981506720
From: "Jim Neiers" <>
Subject: Re: [IOWA] FEEDBACK
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:45:20 -0600
I'm somewhat ambivalant. I think I'm missing some of the information in the
replies. Sometimes, just seeing who replied, what they were concerned
about, where they were researching, and often, allied names was of interest.
I think I'ld vote for a default "reply to all" with encouragement of the
list members to use private email for truly private messages.
On --- the --- otherrrrr----hand-----
Either way is really OK with me.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: [IOWA] FEEDBACK
> Dear Listmembers:
> On January 15, I changed the format of the IOWA list from "reply to list"
> "reply to sender" in order to reduce the quantity of messages each day to
> more manageable number for most people.
> It certainly worked! Although January's message total was high (729)
> of heavy posting during the first half of the month, on the first 5 days
> February only 30 messages were posted to the list. At this rate monthly
> activity will be about 180 messages.
> Here's what the last six months looked like:
> August 2000 612 messages
> September 2000 1078 messages
> October 2000 648 messages
> November 2000 614 messages
> December 2000 616 messages
> January 2001 729 messages
> A lot of the messages we don't see anymore are "thank you" and "me, too"
> messages which aren't essential and probably should be sent as private
> (especially on a list this size). We are seeing lots of questions, but
> few answers posted and often an answer to an unrelated question provides
> valuable hints. The personality of the list seems very different.
> What do you think? Do you like the list better this way or the old way.
> we found a workable answer or dowe need to keep looking. I'd appreciate
> Richard Harrison
> ==== IOWA Mailing List ====
> Find your Iowa surnames at ROOTS-L
> The easiest way to stay in touch with your family and friends!
|Re: [IOWA] FEEDBACK by "Jim Neiers" <>|