IRL-LIMERICK-L Archives

Archiver > IRL-LIMERICK > 2003-09 > 1063113232


From: "Pádraig Mór Ó Gealagáin" <>
Subject: Re: [LMK] MANY SURNAMES, Wrap-Up [Mt.StLawrence]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:13:52 -0400
References: <00e801c3766c$c4d2ca00$3a54db0c@mchsi.com> <000801c37674$a707dc60$a100a8c0@mshome.net> <007201c376c3$b61d9c40$3a54db0c@mchsi.com>


On this Co.Tipperary List [and Limerick List] all I do is
contribute my knowledge and help, as in my search for
family lines I have nothing to gain by being a member of
it.

Your criticisms, editorial posturing and assumed deputy
List Owner positions are becoming very tedious. I am
declaring, as of now, on both Lists and to the List
Administrators, that I will ignore in the future all of
your contributions and trust that the mis-information you
sometimes promulgate in your mostly long-winded
contributions will not mis-lead others.

Hopefully, that ought to end this ongoing tirade you have
for me and sometimes others.

Is Mise Phádraig
[ An t'Sean-Gabhar ;-) ]

**** No Direct Replies - Please! ****
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mchsi.com" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: [LMK] MANY SURNAMES, Wrap-Up [Mt.StLawrence]


> Padraig
>
> You wrote on Monday, September 08, 2003 9:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [LMK] MANY SURNAMES, Wrap-Up [Mt.StLawrence]
>
>
> > It looks as if I am missing something bigtime! - where
is
> > the Mt. St.Lawrence Website, and where is Mt.
St.Lawrence? <
>
> Yes, you did miss "big time." In fact, you missed the
original posting about
> the Mt. St. Lawrence Cemetary which appeared, complete
with the appropriate
> URL, on the Limerick List on 9/6/03. This from the
personal experience or
> "eye witness account" of a reliable Limerick searcher.
Such reports have
> bibliographical importance. You missed this, too.
>
> You also missed my re-posting of the information to the
two Tipperary Lists
> with the addition of full bibliographical ascriptions
from the website
> itself on 9/7/03.
>
> You missed the responses of others on the three Lists who
were interested in
> the information in the interim.
>
> And you missed my identification of Mt. St. Lawrence as a
Cemetary in my
> opening paragraph of my "Wrap Up" message of 9/8/03--the
message you chose
> to criticize.
>
> I'm glad to see you back after your recent illness. But
not this way. You
> (and Cindy) are knowledgeable. You have information to
contribute. I'd like
> to see more good will and concern for Listers who are
still searching for
> their ancestors--something both of you seem to have
concluded. Have some
> understanding for others.
>
> Meanwhile, you both have raised the spectre of scholarly
conventions for
> bibliographical citations. It's a bit tedious. But if you
are genuinely
> interested I will find the online sources which will
inform you that, in the
> present discourse among all participants, the scholarly
conventions have
> been properly observed.
>
> I would therefore suggest that both of you read our email
messages more
> carefully. What we don't need on our Mailing Lists is
internecine warfare
> or, more to the point, quibbling over "territorial
imperatives." We are all
> worth better than that.
>
> Let's get on with it.
>
> Rosemary
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date:
9/1/03

This thread: