KENT-ENG-L Archives
Archiver > KENT-ENG > 2003-05 > 1052301274
From: "Kent-2" <>
Subject: [Kent] Re:1852 Birth Certificate - no father
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:54:34 +0100
References: <5B4C04DA.1E7956BC.006A19F4@aol.com> <0beb01c31439$029f6dc0$384bacce@omeguser> <002f01c313ae$ab3acaa0$fddb1f3e@pcdl22324>
I agree with you whole-heartedly <applause>
Don't normally agree with "me too" posts but
in this case ...............
Regards
Anne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter" <
> Isn't it a shame how children with no father are the ones labelled. Not
the
> Parents.
>
> How much it's changed;
> 1852 - Illegitimate or Bastard (Minority)
> 2003 - Illegitimate or Bastard (Majority) now considered the norm.
>
> I for one being born late sixties still being in the minority, do not
> consider myself as Illegitimate or Bastard, rather consider the father the
> Bastard.
>
> But then we all have our burdens to carry.
>
> Peter.
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 - Release Date: 06/05/03
This thread:
| [Kent] Re:1852 Birth Certificate - no father by "Kent-2" <> |