LANCSGEN-L Archives

Archiver > LANCSGEN > 2008-07 > 1215374557


From: "gllykh" <>
Subject: Re: [LAN] Gt & Lt Marsden 1891
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:02:37 -0700
References: <48711756.5090806@post.com>


Hi Heather
I think that is a mistranscription on Ancestry and that the family of
Maria, Charlotte Mary and Annie are not called Quinney but something
beginning with the letter A,possibly Arms. On the 1881 census there is
Wright family living in Barnoldswick with a daughter Martha M born in
Norwich,Norfolk who matches the info on the 1891 census, mother of Charlotte
Mary,marriage of Martha M to John Arms registered at Burnley
1887,lancashirebmd.ON the 1901 the same people are living at Bracewell St
Nelson with Martha M's mother Mary.
Gilly
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Quineys" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 12:04 PM
Subject: [LAN] Gt & Lt Marsden 1891


> Hello
>
> Could I ask someone to check out a 'next census sheet' for me please?
>
> I have RG12/3376, f20, p26 - Great and Little Marsden, Lancashire -
> Fred'k QUINNEY and his wife, Jane, and their daughter, Bertha.
>
> However, I notice that the transcription for the household includes
> three more QUINNEYs: Maria (aged 28), Charlotte Mary (aged 2) and Annie
> (aged 1). As Fred'k, Jane and Bertha are the last of the page, I can
> only assume that Maria, Charlotte and Annie are on the next page,
> possibly living with a family of WRIGHTs (who are also included on the
> transcription).
>
> Please could someone clarify these three families and, if possible, send
> me a copy of the image? I'm sure that they are related to my husband's
> Gt Grandfather, Frederick, but cannot tie them in at the moment.
>
> Many thanks
> Heather
>
>
>
>
> :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-:
>
> Except for personal messages, please post replies to the list.
> Other people can learn from them!
>
> :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-:
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message


This thread: