LANCSGEN-L Archives

Archiver > LANCSGEN > 2009-06 > 1245090103


From: "MORLEY" <>
Subject: Re: [LAN] BEDDOME in Manchester
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:51:43 +0930
References: <B2EF2AB0FE7847D38B26FC8198673A6E@home><BLU0-SMTP8982790365E9E8591A60D5913E0@phx.gbl><C1ED5D6EECBC45F7A145489CDA24D5DA@admin96491d585>


My goodness I never expected all this help
This list has just been great.
if any of you need help in South Australian records I can help with B D and
M.

Thankyou Mike

Jill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Morris" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:39 AM
Subject: Re: [LAN] BEDDOME in Manchester


> To add to Joans information, I have sent you a section of a map showing
> cheetham street in 1894
>
> Mike Morris
> Toronto Canada
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joan Rooney" <>
> To: <>; <>
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:05 PM
>
>
>> Here is the family in 1841. I can't check the image.
>>
>> Joan
>> Ottawa
>>
>> Benjamin Beddome
>> M56
>>
>> Elizeh Beddome F 52 200
>> Benjamin Beddome M 26 Lancashire 210
>> Samuel Beddome M 23 Lancashire 220
>> Danl Beddome M 21 Lancashire 230
>> Richard Beddome M 20 Lancashire 240
>> George Beddome M 18 Lancashire 250
>> Mary Beddome F 16 Lancashire 10
>> William Beddome M 11 Lancashire 20
>> Jane Randall F 21 30
>>
>> Samuel, Beddome
>> Registration Number:
>> Ho107 Piece: 579 Folio: 7/14 Page: 20
>> Registration District: Salford Sub District:
>> Broughton Enumeration District:
>> Ecclesiastical Parish: Civil Parish:
> Manchester Municipal Ward: Cheetham Street, Great, Manchester, Broughton
> County: Lancashire <snip>
>
>
>
>
> :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-:
>
> Responses to gatewayed posts must be made on the message board, not the
> list. Just click on the link provided to go to the message on the board.
> Your response will then also flow to the list.
>
> :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-: :-+-:
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: