LONDON-L ArchivesArchiver > LONDON > 2000-04 > 0956021570
From: Roz Griston <>
Subject: RE: Parish Registers
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:32:50 -0700
yes, unless that minister was out tending his flock..not having tea
with mrs. uppercrust and family. classism was a way of life in britain
and it is still dying a very slow death.
i mean seriously, to what purpose would it be to put an aside remark in
a register. it was labelling..and remember you could be considered a
whore for living with a man and never marrying him..but in the upper
circles the woman was called a consort. moral judgements went hand and
hand with one's financial status as well as birthright.
consider the term fallen woman..where had she fallen from?
From:Mary Brockmeyer [SMTP:]
Sent:Monday, April 17, 2000 3:21 PM
Subject:Re: Parish Registers
----- Original Message -----
From: Joyce Stevens <>
>>Apparently, parish priests felt free to write any comments they
>>deaths, etc, such as thief, prostitute, beggar, good man, etc.
Am I wrong in my thought that these were not judgment calls on the part
the priest, but were instead acknowledged fact?
Mary Hayward Brockmeyer
==== LONDON Mailing List ====
To do a search of the London Archives go to
|RE: Parish Registers by Roz Griston <>|