LONDON-L Archives

Archiver > LONDON > 2002-01 > 1010312227


From: "Mike Harvey" <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] 1901 census
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:17:07 -0000
References: <MABBLHGJAKHHGKEHNNHJKECFDGAA.kate.martinson@cwcom.net> <3C382B5E.29EDD0C7@tpg.com.au>


Unfortunately No!

----- Original Message -----
From: "cathy" <>
To: <>
Sent: 06 January 2002 10:47
Subject: Re: [Lon] 1901 census


> It is pretty unbelievable isn't it.
>
> Cathy
>
> Kate Martinson wrote:
>
> > Ohhh myyyyy Gahhhhhd!
> >
> >
> > >Cathy wrote
>
> > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > >Read this snippet on the Hampshire list, <:~|> with thanks to Jeanne
> > >Bunting.
> > >
> > >Cathy in South Australia
> > >
> > >Message reads:
> > >
> > >Those interested in the likelihood of errors in the 1901 census index
> > >may be
> > >interested in the following information which Jeanne Bunting posted to
> > >the
> > >SoG List:
> > >
> > >> Great News! If you are researching the surname DITTO, there are 39 of
> > >
> > >them in the 1901 census!! One of them, Ada Ditto was born in Ditto
> > >Ditto!!
> > >
> > >Jeanne is now planning to investigate how many individuals are indexed
> > >under
> > >the surname "Do".
>
>
>
> ==== LONDON Mailing List ====
> Genealogy & Local History in London, England:
>
> http://www.londonancestor.com/
>
>
>

This thread: