LONDON-L Archives

Archiver > LONDON > 2002-01 > 1010315529


From: "Jonathan Mallam-Clark" <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] 1901 census
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:13:59 -0000
References: <MABBLHGJAKHHGKEHNNHJKECFDGAA.kate.martinson@cwcom.net> <3C382B5E.29EDD0C7@tpg.com.au> <007401c1969b$64f416a0$7a075cc3@sophie>


It makes me wonder. Do they actually consult any genealogists when they're
doing this?

You know - its perhaps worth founding a Genealogy pressure group! Seriously.

Jonathan Mallam-Clark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Harvey" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Lon] 1901 census


> Unfortunately No!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cathy" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: 06 January 2002 10:47
> Subject: Re: [Lon] 1901 census
>
>
> > It is pretty unbelievable isn't it.
> >
> > Cathy
> >
> > Kate Martinson wrote:
> >
> > > Ohhh myyyyy Gahhhhhd!
> > >
> > >
> > > >Cathy wrote
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > >Read this snippet on the Hampshire list, <:~|> with thanks to Jeanne
> > > >Bunting.
> > > >
> > > >Cathy in South Australia
> > > >
> > > >Message reads:
> > > >
> > > >Those interested in the likelihood of errors in the 1901 census index
> > > >may be
> > > >interested in the following information which Jeanne Bunting posted
to
> > > >the
> > > >SoG List:
> > > >
> > > >> Great News! If you are researching the surname DITTO, there are 39
of
> > > >
> > > >them in the 1901 census!! One of them, Ada Ditto was born in Ditto
> > > >Ditto!!
> > > >
> > > >Jeanne is now planning to investigate how many individuals are
indexed
> > > >under
> > > >the surname "Do".
> >
> >
> >
> > ==== LONDON Mailing List ====
> > Genealogy & Local History in London, England:
> >
> > http://www.londonancestor.com/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ==== LONDON Mailing List ====
> Genealogy & Local History in London, England:
>
> http://www.londonancestor.com/
>

This thread: