LONDON-L Archives

Archiver > LONDON > 2002-04 > 1018989462


From: "Skyler" <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] MOTHER-IN-LAW
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:40:14 +1200
References: <8qugbuoe5nliontfcahc0p5nqitclrhllk@4ax.com> <00c501c1e336$27071800$7b28989e@oemcomputer> <00ad01c1e550$abcf04a0$8f449d18@ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com>


I wonder if anyone has given thought that the ma-in-law could have been
married twice.
Chris Lethaby
----- Original Message -----
From: beth wearing <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Lon] MOTHER-IN-LAW


> Josi
>
> Maybe Ma-in-law had been married a second time, first time became
Cuthbert.
> Unless of course he'd been married before to a Gaggen. But I guess then
she
> wouldn't have been a ma-in-law???? Interesting.
>
> Beth in Toronto
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <>
> > To: <>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 7:50 PM
> > Subject: [Lon] MOTHER-IN-LAW
>
> > > Can anyone say if the term ma-in-law was used
> > > in any other way?than the usual term?
> > > we have 1879
> > > Mary A..== John Atkins
> > >
> > > Ann Gaggen Mother-in-law to head of household.
> > > John's wife was Mary Atkins formerly Cuthbert
>
>
>
> ==== LONDON Mailing List ====
> London and North Middlesex FHS web site:
> http://www.lnmfhs.dircon.co.uk/
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 14/03/02


This thread: