LONDON-L Archives

From: Eve McLaughlin <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] Relationship question.
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:55:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0204230157030.761-100000@bret.busby.net>

>> The first one is related by:
>> His Grandfather is my Great Grandmothers Brother.
Second cousin once removed. You go back to the common ancestor gtgtgfr,
ignored the first generation (who are siblings,) then count each level
generation (2). You are the third generation, so you are once removed
from a 2nd cousin. His children would be your third cousins, and THEIR
children would be your third cousins once removed.

--
Eve McLaughlin

Author of the McLaughlin Guides for family historians
Secretary Bucks Genealogical Society

This thread:

• [Lon] Relationship question. by
  • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by helnphil <>
    • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by "Roger Lovegrove" <>
  • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by Bret Busby <>
    • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by "Skyler" <>
      • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by "JEANETTE SHERMER" <>
    • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by "tjhowell1" <>
      • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by "derekive" <>

    • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by Eve McLaughlin <>

  • Fw: [Lon] Relationship question. by "Betty" <>
  • Fw: [Lon] Relationship question. by "M La Rooij" <>
    • Re: [Lon] Relationship question. by "Caroline Mannix" <>