LONDON-L Archives

Archiver > LONDON > 2002-07 > 1027818014


From: Eve McLaughlin <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] KILLINGLY/KILLINGLEY
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 02:00:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <001f01c2354f$40fce800$750886d9@himself>


In message <001f01c2354f$40fce800$>, Frank WILLIAMS
<> writes
>Can't really see any great difference between Peg's original posting re
>KILLINGLY/KILLINGLEY and the many "Posting/Reposting interests" messages
>which appear on the Lists.
And most of these only get answered if there happens to be anyone
researching that name. What put people out was the fact that Peg
followed it within 8 hours with an impatient complaint that no one had
yet answered yes OR NO, which is an obvious invitation to fill the list
with negatives.
>

--
Eve McLaughlin

Author of the McLaughlin Guides for family historians
Secretary Bucks Genealogical Society

This thread: