LONDON-L Archives

Archiver > LONDON > 2004-01 > 1074056302


From: "bcunning" <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:06:20 +1100
References: <RTBSyhA0WJBAFwhp@varneys.demon.co.uk>


Betty's message also mentioned that the bride was also described as a 'silk
winder' on another document. I believe the spelling should have been
"windster" which is a "silk winder" See

http://cpug.org/user/jlacombe/terms.html

Cheers, Bob in Australia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eve McLaughlin" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839


> In message <000701c3d975$d8bf90e0$>, Betty Martin
> <> writes
> >I am trying to tidy up my 2003 research before I start on 2004! and I
have
> >an occupation on a marriage entry which says that the bride is a
`winster'
> not a word - probably a mistaken entry , when the clerk started writing
> winder and his eye strayed to spinster.
>
>


This thread: