LONDON-L Archives

Archiver > LONDON > 2004-01 > 1074056681


From: "bcunning" <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:12:45 +1100


Sorry. Try http://cpcug.org/user/jlacombe/terms.html

That will work. Cheers, Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "bcunning" <>
To: "Eve McLaughlin" <>; <>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839


> Betty's message also mentioned that the bride was also described as a
'silk
> winder' on another document. I believe the spelling should have been
> "windster" which is a "silk winder" See
>
> http://cpug.org/user/jlacombe/terms.html
>
> Cheers, Bob in Australia
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eve McLaughlin" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839
>
>
> > In message <000701c3d975$d8bf90e0$>, Betty Martin
> > <> writes
> > >I am trying to tidy up my 2003 research before I start on 2004! and I
> have
> > >an occupation on a marriage entry which says that the bride is a
> `winster'
> > not a word - probably a mistaken entry , when the clerk started writing
> > winder and his eye strayed to spinster.
> >
> >
>

This thread: