LONDON-L Archives
Archiver > LONDON > 2004-01 > 1074125406
From: Eve McLaughlin <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:10:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <008401c3da5c$299ce3a0$16cb32d2@i0l4o7>
In message <008401c3da5c$299ce3a0$>, bcunning
<> writes
>Betty's message also mentioned that the bride was also described as a 'silk
>winder' on another document. I believe the spelling should have been
>"windster" which is a "silk winder" See
it is an error - not a C19 word. Have you been at your dodgy dictionary
again?
--
Eve McLaughlin
Author of the McLaughlin Guides for family historians
Secretary Bucks Genealogical Society
This thread:
| Re: [Lon] occupation `winster' 1839 by Eve McLaughlin <> |