LONDON-L Archives

From: Frances Lee <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:04:05 GMT
References: <018501c4f747$770a7810$2a972bd9@Mojflo>
In-Reply-To: <018501c4f747$770a7810$2a972bd9@Mojflo>

Maureen Avery wrote:

> Also I was quite surprised that he was not baptised during the 3 months she and my great grandfather spent
there.
>
Maureen

As you say the mother married the father when she was discharged, this was proably the reason why she did not
have the child baptised whilst she was in there. If she had her maiden name would be on the document whereas
after her marriage it would have her married name. Same applies to the baby!

Frances

This thread:

• Workhouse birth by "MAUREEN AVERY" <>
  • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "Dave Dixon" <>
    • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "Toni Leather" <>
      • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by Eve McLaughlin <>
    • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by Eve McLaughlin <>

  • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by Frances Lee <>

  • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by Eve McLaughlin <>
  • Workhouse birth by MADELEINE BERKS <>
    • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by NICOLA RELFFE-ARNOLD <>
      • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by JOANNA BLATCHLEY <>
      • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by Eve McLaughlin <>
    • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "christine MILLER" <>
      • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "Janice Aitkens" <>
        • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "christine MILLER" <>
          • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "Janice Aitkens" <>
    • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by "jeanne mccormick" <>
    • Re: [Lon] Workhouse birth by Eve McLaughlin <>
  • Re: workhouse birth by "Beth Horsburgh" <>
    • Re: [Lon] Re: workhouse birth by "Janice Aitkens" <>
      • Births in the Workhouse by Josi <>
      • Re: [Lon] Re: workhouse birth by "Dave Dixon" <>
  • Workhouse Birth by MADELEINE BERKS <>