LONDON-L Archives
Archiver > LONDON > 2005-05 > 1115727823
From: Josi <>
Subject: writing to churches
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:23:43 +0100
References: <25367791.1115723871156.JavaMail.www@wwinf3101> <001601c55555$1570eaf0$87e40050@userhat9ht714s>
In-Reply-To: <001601c55555$1570eaf0$87e40050@userhat9ht714s>
Rude? I expect all you paragons of virtue never hang up the phone from
an intrusive ph call and you do answer everyone who send you the
envelope eh? junk or not...of course you do.
How many enclose the postage? writing to a lady some time ago
by email in absence of a reply I wrote by mail.
The WIDOWER responded.... to the stamp
for all you know the priest is gone to his maker
and his duty is to his flock...no one regrets it more that some eejit
talked a priest into having an email adddress....
I have always had a reply....
but my standards and eloquence are not up to everyone else's
so I guess the recipient feels sorry for me...
Try Humble...whatever works
jo
-------------------------------------
Volume 14 of my Newsletter is back on
www.btinternet.com/~finty/
See if you can identify the mystery guests
------------------------------------------
This thread:
| writing to churches by Josi <> |