LONDON-L Archives

From: Sharon <>
Subject: Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:36:35 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <004c01c6496b$1948d650$0300a8c0@eddyc349m>

Oh, well, what's one year? lol

Sharon

Jon Nixey <> wrote: Hi Sharon,

Considering it's the 1911 census not 1910 they're even more out of luck!

Cheers, Jon



---------------------------------
Make Yahoo! Canada your Homepage Yahoo! Canada Homepage

This thread:

• Rogers 1910 by "Goldstraw" <>
  • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by Sharon <>
    • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by "Jon Nixey" <>

      • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by Sharon <>

        • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by Elizabeth Kipp <>
          • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by Sharon <>
          • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by Jackie Serna <>
        • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by "Jon Nixey" <>
          • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by "Judy Lester" <>
  • Re: [Lon] Rogers 1910 by "Ron Lankshear (Sydney Aust)" <>
  • RE: Rogers 1910 by Martin Willcocks <>