LOST-COLONY-L Archives

Archiver > LOST-COLONY > 2007-07 > 1185394970


From:
Subject: Re: [LOST-COLONY] Lost Colony Center for Science and ResearchSeekng Descenda...
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:22:50 EDT



This information copied from _www.genforum.genealogy.com/sizemore_
(http://www.genforum.genealogy.com/sizemore) <gary>
There is also a DNA results page on the Sizemores and apparently a great
deal of Indian blood has been found. You will find data on the origin of
the
name. I'd like to add that the name may have originally been Sycamore
and also that it was a combination of Sickle (the farm implement) and
Moor (the wasteland of England). gary
-----------------------------------------------------
Surry Co., VA- 10 June 1654. Deed Thomas ROLFE to Wm. CORKER 150 acres of
land between SMITH's Fort old field & the Divell's Woodyard Swampe & all
houses, etc., being due unto the sd ROLFE by guift from the INDYAN KING.
Wit: Ja. MASON, Edmund HOWELL.
On backside assigned by Wm CORKER to Wm. BARBER, 22 Aug. 1654.
Wit: Richd. WEBSTER, SAM SUKLEMOE. [Is this SIZEMORE? JK]
Assigned by Wm BARBER to Rober GILBERT and Xo. MITCHELL on 1 Dec. 1654.
Wit: Wm. MARRIOTT, Jno. BRADY.
Interest assigned by Chr. MITCHELL to Roger GILBER.
Wit: Jno. CORKER.17

Note JK: The above dates are shown in this deed but all other entries in
this section are dated 1674. If the 1654 date is correct, SAM would have been at
least 21 so born by 1633 or earlier.
Surry Co., VA- 10 June 1654. Deed Thomas ROLFE to Wm. CORKER 150 acres of
land between SMITH's Fort old field & the Divell's Woodyard Swampe & all
houses, etc., being due unto the sd ROLFE by guift from the INDYAN KING.
Wit: Ja. MASON, Edmund HOWELL.
On backside assigned by Wm CORKER to Wm. BARBER, 22 Aug. 1654.
Wit: Richd. WEBSTER, SAM SUKLEMOE. [Is this SIZEMORE? JK]
Assigned by Wm BARBER to Rober GILBERT and Xo. MITCHELL on 1 Dec. 1654.
Wit: Wm. MARRIOTT, Jno. BRADY.
Interest assigned by Chr. MITCHELL to Roger GILBER.
Wit: Jno. CORKER.17
Note JK: The above dates are shown in this deed but all other entries in
this section are dated 1674. If the 1654 date is correct, SAM would have been at
least 21 so born by 1633 or earlier.



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

This thread: