Listowners-L Archives

Archiver > Listowners > 1999-02 > 0919462679

From: "Ed Heral" <>
Subject: Re: The RootsWeb renewal notice
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:17:59 -0600

I think this does bring up one point. We should always try to be sure we
have the correct facts and all the facts before making judgements and
leaping to conclusions. <G>

----- Original Message -----
From: Den_Mari <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: The RootsWeb renewal notice

>I think you've uncovered the problem! I just couldn't believe that Brian
>OR Karen would chop off their noses to spite their faces. I highly doubt
>that it was altered, seeing as how it probably was mailed BEFORE this
>discussion began. Doesn't seem possible for it to have been done that
>quickly and then mailed in time for you to get the notice to coincide with
>the question at hand!
>At 03:30 PM 2/19/99 , you wrote:
>>I may be missing something but...
>>I received my personal RootsWeb renewal notice today. The infamous third
>>paragraph (as quoted previously) was not part of the notice at all - in
>>fact I thought it was a very well-written notice completely encouraging
>>me to renew. Has it already been altered? Was the notice quoted
>>previously actually a second notice?
>>For any of those interested, I've included the full text at the end of
>>Diane Kurtz

This thread: