Listowners-L Archives
Archiver > Listowners > 1999-03 > 0922628352
From: "Andrew Billinghurst" <>
Subject: Re: Message not in Digest
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 23:39:12 +1000
On 27 Mar 99, at 19:28, Tim Pierce <> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 1999 at 11:58:21AM -0500, B.J. Smothers wrote:
> > Hey Joan,
> >
> > Yes, sure it came through the list because some folks sent replies to me
> > with the subject heading. I did get an administrative message that
> > accompanied it though but ignored that when I saw that this was archived.
> > Dumped that message do can't send it.
>
> That message would probably have included the reason why it didn't get
> posted on the digest.
>
Actually Tim, Vicki and I are going through a similar problem with my
other address to this list at the moment. For the digest it is
returning a {not a subscriber} and the X-Command, and the X-List:
Listowners-D.
To me it seemed like the hard link between the -L and -D had broken
(if possible), I think in the end that Vicki added the bouncing
address to the Accept list. If this one bounces then I am sure that
if you ask nicely Vicki could forward the bounce <vbg>
Regards Andrew
This thread:
| Re: Message not in Digest by "Andrew Billinghurst" <> |